Dear Mr. Njie,
I would like to express my gratitude for your recent programme featuring Hon Sallah. It was both enlightening and educational. After listening, I found myself reflecting on the various points he raised, particularly regarding the 1965, 1997, and the Draft Constitution of 2020. I imagine that many constitutional lawyers in The Gambia would have been equally impressed by his insights. I hope you consider reaching out to Pa Nderry of Star FM to have the programme aired on local radio, allowing more people—especially those without internet access—to benefit from the discussion.
It is unfortunate to see such a distinguished figure slowly retreat from public life, as age and political circumstances begin to take their toll. Nevertheless, his cognitive abilities remain sharp, which was evident in his articulate contributions to the programme. I am pleased to hear of his upcoming book, which I believe will serve as a lasting part of his legacy. Yet, I fear many people will buy the book as a symbol rather than a source of knowledge, as many may store it in their glass cupboards rather than read it to understand his contributions.
As I reflected on his style of communication, it became clear to me that Hon Sallah is more suited to the role of a teacher or professor than a political leader. I speak from over two decades of both practical and theoretical leadership experience when I say that effective communication is key for any politician. Hon Sallah’s style often feels more like a lecture—lengthy, detailed, and dominant. While depth is important, politicians must also be concise and clear. They need to engage their audience, not overwhelm them. Unfortunately, this is where I feel Hon Sallah falters. His explanations, though intellectually sound, may leave many disengaged or unable to grasp the core message, which is crucial for a leader.
A successful political leader must be pragmatic, decisive, adaptable, and—most importantly—able to communicate clearly and persuasively. Hon Sallah’s strength lies in his integrity, empathy, humility, and visionary outlook, especially when it comes to setting long-term societal goals. However, his lack of concise, effective communication has limited his ability to connect with a broader audience throughout his political career. While some of his supporters may view this as harsh criticism, I offer this perspective as someone with significant leadership experience and education. Had Hon Sallah honed this vital skill earlier, he might have been more successful in rallying support for his causes.
His visionary approach is commendable, and his commitment to motivating positive societal change is profound. However, the reality is that excessive focus on rules, bureaucracy, and protocols can stifle pragmatism and delay the achievement of important objectives. It is our collective responsibility to acknowledge our weaknesses, engage with difficult truths, and address key issues if we are to advance as a civilised and progressive society.
Saul Jawara